(314) 254-9766 info@byrneandjones.com
Parking Lot Surface Options: Asphalt vs Concrete Comparison Guide

Parking Lot Surface Options: Asphalt vs Concrete Comparison Guide

Choosing the best parking lot surface for your next parking lot project blog graphic

Parking Lot Surface Options: Choosing Between Asphalt and Concrete Comparison Guide

When it comes to choosing the best surface for your parking lot, the two main options that business owners and property managers consider are asphalt and concrete. Both materials have their advantages, and the right choice depends on various factors specific to your project. This comprehensive guide will help you compare asphalt and concrete parking lot surfaces to make an informed decision.

Comparing the pros and cons of Asphalt and Concrete Parking Lot Surfaces

Cost Considerations

The cost of asphalt versus concrete is often a primary consideration when it comes to deciding which surface is best for a parking lot. Generally, asphalt parking lots are less expensive to install initially. However, it’s important to consider the long-term costs as well. While concrete may have a higher upfront cost, it often requires less frequent maintenance, which can lead to lower expenses over time. 

When comparing the cost of asphalt driveways versus concrete, the same principles apply. The initial investment for a concrete driveway is typically higher, but its longer lifespan may offset this cost over time.

Durability and Lifespan

Concrete parking lots generally have a longer lifespan compared to asphalt. A well-maintained concrete lot can last 30-40 years, while asphalt typically lasts 20-30 years. However, it is important to remember that for an asphalt surface to last that long, an asphalt maintenance plan should be put in place at the time of installation. An asphalt maintenance plan can help parking lot owners better understand the long-term costs associated with maintaining an asphalt surface. This difference in longevity should be factored into your decision, especially if you’re planning for the long term.

Maintenance Requirements

Asphalt requires more frequent maintenance, including sealcoating every 3-5 years to protect the surface. Concrete, while generally requiring less frequent maintenance, can be more expensive to repair when damage does occur. Consider your capacity for regular maintenance when choosing between these options.

Climate and Weather Considerations

Your local climate plays a significant role in determining the best surface for your parking lot. Asphalt tends to perform better in cold climates and areas with frequent freeze-thaw cycles. It’s also worth noting that parking a car on grass in winter can be problematic, making a paved surface essential in colder regions.

Concrete, on the other hand, performs well in hot climates as it doesn’t soften or become sticky in extreme heat. However, it can be more prone to cracking in very cold temperatures.

Traffic Load and Usage

Consider the type and volume of traffic your parking lot will experience. Concrete is generally better suited for heavy vehicles and high traffic areas. For multi-level parking design standards, concrete is often preferred due to its strength and durability.

Asphalt works well for standard passenger vehicles and moderate traffic. It’s often used in residential parking design due to its cost-effectiveness and ease of installation.

Installation Time and Process

Asphalt can typically be used within 24-48 hours after installation, making it a good choice when time is a critical factor. Concrete requires a longer curing time, usually at least a week before it can bear vehicle weight.

Aesthetics and Customization

Concrete offers more design options, including the ability to add color or stamp patterns into the surface. For those interested in interlocking bricks for parking or parking tiles for home use, concrete pavers can provide an attractive and durable option.

Asphalt provides a uniform, dark surface that many find attractive in its simplicity and is effective at hiding oil stains and tire marks.

Choosing between an asphalt or concrete surfacing for a parking lot

Alternative Parking Lot Surface Materials

While asphalt and concrete are the most common choices, there are other parking lot surface options to consider:

  1. Permeable pavers: These allow water to drain through the surface, reducing runoff and potentially helping with stormwater management.
  2. Gravel: A cost-effective option for low-traffic areas, though it requires regular maintenance. If you are considering gravel, check out this guide.
  3. Recycled materials: Some innovative solutions use recycled plastic or rubber to create durable parking surfaces.

Parking Lot Construction and Repair

Whether you’re building a new parking lot or repairing an existing one, proper construction techniques are crucial. This includes ensuring adequate drainage, proper subgrade preparation, and appropriate thickness of materials.

For those wondering about parking lot repair costs, it varies depending on the material and extent of damage. Asphalt repairs are typically less expensive than concrete, but may be needed more frequently.

Making the Right Choice for Your Parking Lot

When deciding between asphalt and concrete for your parking lot surface, consider your budget, climate, expected traffic, aesthetic preferences, and long-term plans. Remember, there’s no one-size-fits-all solution – the right choice depends on your unique circumstances and priorities.

Need expert advice on your parking lot project? Whether you’re looking at parking lot material options, considering the cost of asphalt vs concrete, or exploring the best material for a parking area, Byrne & Jones Construction can help. Contact us for a free consultation at (314) 254-9766. We specialize in both asphalt and concrete solutions to meet your unique parking lot needs.

Discover the many benefits of Full-Depth Reclamation

Discover the many benefits of Full-Depth Reclamation

FDRBenefits

Discover the Many Benefits of Full-Depth Reclamation

Full-depth reclamation (FDR) is revolutionizing asphalt rehabilitation. This innovative technique offers a cost-effective, environmentally friendly solution for extending the life of deteriorating roadways. Discover how Byrne & Jones Construction utilizes FDR to provide superior asphalt solutions to our clients.

What is full-depth reclamation?

Full-depth reclamation (FDR) is an advanced pavement rehabilitation technique that transforms deteriorated asphalt pavements into strong, durable base courses for new road surfaces. This innovative process involves pulverizing the full depth of the existing asphalt pavement along with a predetermined portion of the underlying base, subbase, or subgrade materials. The resulting mixture is then blended, reshaped, and compacted to create a homogeneous base layer.

Key aspects of FDR include:

  1. Depth of Treatment: FDR typically addresses 4 to 12 inches of the pavement structure, allowing for comprehensive rehabilitation of the roadway.
  2. In-Place Recycling: Unlike traditional methods that require removal and disposal of old materials, FDR recycles existing pavement materials on-site, significantly reducing waste and transportation costs.
  3. Material Enhancement: Depending on project requirements, additional aggregate, chemical stabilizers, or bituminous materials may be incorporated to improve the performance characteristics of the reclaimed layer.

What are the different types of full-depth reclamation?

  • Mechanical Stabilization: includes the addition of aggregate materials
  • Chemical Stabilization: includes the addition of lime, cement, or fly ash
  • Bituminous Stabilization: includes the addition of asphalt based emulsions or foamed asphalt

Intersted in the process of Full Depth Reclamation? Check out this video. 

Full-Depth Reclamation being performed in St. Louis, MO.
Full-Depth Reclamation being performed in St. Louis, MO.

What are some of the advantages of Full Depth Reclamation?

Cost-Effective

This process has proven to be cost effective as it creates long lasting pavement, leading to less repairs down the road. The FDR process creates a higher load carrying capacity and also reduces moisture susceptibility. The result is a stronger, longer-lasting surface. Combine that with the cost-savings, and Full Depth Reclamation becomes an even more attractive alternative to completely removing and installing a new asphalt surface.

More owners are discovering they can save 30%-50% of total project costs when they let the experts at Byrne & Jones Construction perform the Full Depth Reclamation process on their worn-out asphalt parking lots.

Time-Efficient

Full-Depth Reclamation significantly reduces project timelines compared to traditional reconstruction methods. The in-place recycling process eliminates the need for extensive material removal and replacement, allowing projects to progress rapidly. With specialized equipment, FDR can treat large areas quickly, often completing several miles of roadway in just a few days. This efficiency minimizes traffic disruptions and reduces the overall impact on local communities and businesses. By streamlining the rehabilitation process, FDR enables faster project completion, allowing roads to reopen sooner and reducing labor costs. The time savings provided by FDR translate to both economic benefits for project owners and reduced inconvenience for road users.

Versatility

Full-Depth Reclamation adapts to a wide range of pavement rehabilitation needs. From highways and local roads to parking lots and airport runways, FDR offers a solution for various infrastructure types. This versatility allows project managers to apply a single, efficient technique across diverse projects, streamlining operations and reducing the need for multiple specialized approaches. FDR’s adaptability to different pavement conditions and traffic loads makes it an invaluable tool in any road maintenance arsenal.

Superior Structural Improvement

FDR addresses pavement issues at their core, providing comprehensive structural enhancement. By pulverizing and reconstituting the entire pavement section, including the base layers, FDR corrects deep-seated problems like rutting, cracking, and poor drainage. This thorough approach results in a stronger, more uniform pavement structure capable of withstanding heavy loads and environmental stresses. The improved structural integrity translates to longer-lasting roads, reduced maintenance needs, and enhanced safety for road users.

Highly Customizable Process

Every road rehabilitation project has unique challenges, and FDR offers the flexibility to meet them head-on. The process can be tailored to specific project requirements, allowing engineers to adjust variables such as treatment depth, stabilizer type, and mix design. This customization ensures optimal results for each application, whether it’s increasing load-bearing capacity for heavy traffic routes or enhancing durability in harsh climates. The ability to fine-tune the FDR process results in more efficient use of resources and better long-term performance of the rehabilitated pavement.

Environmentally Friendly  

Since this technique uses reclaimed material, it has less of an impact on the environment. Head of Byrne & Jones Construction Asphalt Division, Kevin Klette says, “Instead of having to dig up and remove the old asphalt surface before installing a new one, FDR pulverizes the old surface, compacts it, and then we mix an additive that creates a stronger base for the asphalt mix.” According to the National Asphalt Pavement Association, 2.4 million metric tons of CO2e were spared from the atmosphere in 2019 through the use of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) in new mixtures. 

This technique allows for the conservation of energy and material. According to Klette, “Full Depth Reclamation offers more than just cost-savings. It helps conserve energy since there’s no need to haul away or import new materials. It saves natural resources and energy since it recycles existing material and it eliminates material disposal concerns, making it a much more environmentally-friendly route to take.”

Full Depth Reclamation requires a variety of specialized equipment that most asphalt paving contractors simply do not have. Byrne & Jones Construction not only has the equipment, but also has the know-how to perform the variety of steps involved throughout the process. If you are interested in seeing Byrne & Jones Construction’s work in person then call and ask about our jobs at Watlow Electric or Ladue Middle School. To schedule a live recycling demo, contact us at 314-254-9766.

The Complete Guide to Running Track Construction: From Planning to Completion

The Complete Guide to Running Track Construction: From Planning to Completion

Running Track Construction Explained: A Decision-Maker’s Guide for Schools & Universities

Building a running track is one of the most expensive and consequential athletic facility decisions a school will make in a decade. A 400m polyurethane track typically runs $400,000 to over $1 million, and the system you select will determine athlete performance, competition certification eligibility, and maintenance burden for the next 12-15 years. The decisions you make in planning — surface system, base construction, drainage, field events, certification level — have downstream consequences that are difficult and expensive to reverse.

This guide walks athletic directors, facilities managers, and school board members through what is actually involved in running track construction, from the initial planning phase through final inspection. The goal isn’t to make you an expert in polyurethane chemistry. It’s to help you ask the right questions, evaluate proposals on the right criteria, and avoid the common procurement mistakes that lead to premature track failure.

If your project is ready to move from planning to execution, see Byrne & Jones Sports’ running track construction services across the Midwest — including Missouri, Illinois, Ohio, Tennessee, Arkansas, Iowa, Wisconsin, Kentucky, and Indiana.

Riverton High School Running Track Resurfacing
Riverton High School Athletic Running Track Construction

Planning and Designing Your Running Track

Most running track projects fail in planning, not construction. Before you solicit bids or evaluate contractors, work through these decisions:

Certification level. Will this track host certified competitions? IAAF / World Athletics certification requires specific dimensional tolerances, lane width, surface performance characteristics, and documented testing. NCAA certification has similar but distinct requirements. For high school tracks where the primary use is conference meets, state high school athletic association standards may be the appropriate target. Each level has cost implications.

Surface system selection. Polyurethane track surfaces are not interchangeable. The four major system types — full pour, sandwich, structural spray, and base mat — differ in cushioning, energy return, surface texture, durability, and cost. A Division I university and a 4A high school will rarely choose the same system, even though both are running tracks.

Field events. A complete track facility includes pole vault, high jump, long jump, triple jump, javelin, discus, shot put, hammer, and sometimes steeplechase. Each event area has its own design and construction requirements, and integration with the running surface affects both cost and lane configuration.

Drainage assessment. Poor drainage is the single most common cause of premature track failure. Existing site drainage, soil conditions, water table depth, and any nearby grade changes all need engineering review before surface selection.

Lane configuration. Most modern tracks are 8-lane facilities (8 lanes around the curve, 9 in the straightaway). Older 6-lane tracks are still common at some high schools. The decision affects footprint, cost, and competition hosting potential.

Understanding the Running Track Construction Process

A typical new track construction follows six phases:

Phase 1 — Site preparation. Existing surface removal (if any), grading, excavation. Bad grading at this stage is impossible to fix later without rework.

Phase 2 — Drainage. Sub-surface drainage installation, including any French drains, perimeter drains, or piped systems required by the site. Experienced track builders treat drainage as a critical phase — poor drainage causes more surface failures than any other single factor.

Phase 3 — Aggregate base. Compacted stone base layers, typically 8-12 inches deep depending on soil conditions and surface system requirements. Compaction testing should be documented at this stage.

Phase 4 — Asphalt base. A 3-4 inch asphalt layer over the aggregate base. This is where many projects go wrong: the asphalt base must be poured by a contractor experienced with the dimensional tolerances and surface profile required for polyurethane track surfacing. A general commercial paving crew is not enough. This is one reason to favor ASBA-certified track builders who maintain their own commercial paving capacity rather than subcontracting the base.

Phase 5 — Surface application. The polyurethane track surface — full pour, sandwich, structural spray, or base mat — is applied in controlled conditions. Temperature, humidity, and material mixing all affect the final surface. This is where the chosen system is actually installed; the steps before this are setup.

Phase 6 — Striping and field events. Lane lines, exchange zones, field event markings (long jump, high jump, throws). Striping is applied to dimensional tolerances. Final inspection confirms competition-ready status.

Running Track Construction Timeline: What to Expect

Most school athletic directors underestimate the calendar required for a track project. A realistic timeline:

Pre-construction (3-6 months): Planning, board approval, funding confirmation, bid solicitation, contractor selection, permitting, engineering review. Larger projects can take a full year of pre-construction work.

Construction (8-14 weeks): Most polyurethane track construction projects, from site prep through final striping, take 8 to 14 weeks once on-site work begins. Schedule depends on weather, surface system, and project scope. Midwest track projects are typically scheduled May through August to capture stable weather and avoid disrupting athletic programs.

Cure and acceptance (2-4 weeks): After surface installation, the polyurethane requires cure time before competition use. Final inspection by a certified track builder confirms tolerances and competition certification.

Total elapsed time: 6 to 9 months is realistic for most school projects from go-decision to first competition use. Plan accordingly.

Cost of Running Track Construction

Running track construction costs vary widely based on surface system, site conditions, and project scope. General guidance for budgeting:

  • Track resurfacing only (over existing asphalt base): $80,000 to $200,000 depending on track size, surface condition, and chosen system.
  • Full polyurethane resurfacing with base repair: $150,000 to $350,000.
  • New track construction (base, drainage, surface, field events): $400,000 to $1.2 million for a standard 400m, 8-lane facility. Higher-end systems and complex sites can run $1.5 million or more.

The largest cost drivers are surface system (full pour systems cost 2-3x structural spray), base construction (drainage and engineering for difficult sites adds significantly), field events (each additional event area adds cost), and site access (urban sites with limited staging area cost more than greenfield rural sites).

For current pricing and a no-cost site evaluation, see Byrne & Jones running track services. The Sports team provides free track evaluations and detailed proposals for schools and universities across the Midwest.

Questions to Ask Before Hiring a Running Track Contractor

Are you ASBA-certified, and how many of your builders hold the Certified Track Builder credential?

The American Sports Builders Association’s Certified Track Builder program is the industry’s primary credential. A serious track contractor will have multiple CTB-certified personnel on staff, not just one.

How many running track projects has your team completed in the past five years?

Volume signals experience. A contractor who builds 1-2 tracks per year has a different skill base than one who builds 8-15.

Do you own your paving capability, or do you subcontract the asphalt base?

The asphalt base is where most track surface failures begin. Contractors who own their commercial paving capability (rather than subcontracting it) control quality on the most failure-prone phase of construction.

Which polyurethane track systems do you install, and which do you recommend for our facility type?

A contractor who only installs one system will recommend that system regardless of fit. Contractors who install multiple systems (full pour, sandwich, structural spray, base mat) can match the system to your competition level and budget.

Which surface manufacturers do you work with, and are you certified to install their products?

Manufacturer certifications are required to honor most polyurethane track warranties. Ask for documentation.

Can you share recent project references, ideally from schools or universities similar to ours?

Ask for references in your state or region. Contact 2-3 of them. Ask specifically about timeline adherence, change orders, and post-construction support.

What does your project timeline look like, and when can you schedule us?

Most Midwest track contractors book the summer construction window 6-12 months in advance. If a contractor offers immediate availability for a summer slot, ask why.

What warranty do you offer on the surface and on workmanship?

Typical surface manufacturer warranties run 5 to 8 years. Workmanship warranties from the contractor vary widely. Get both in writing.

Are you set up to work through cooperative purchasing agencies?

Schools using TIPS, Sourcewell, OMNIA Partners, or state co-op agreements can streamline procurement significantly. Confirm membership before assuming eligibility.

How do you handle the post-construction maintenance handoff?

A reputable contractor will provide a written maintenance schedule and be available for the first annual inspection.

Get Started with your next project by speaking with our Sports Division

We believe that every athlete, regardless of their level, deserves access to top-quality running tracks and athletic facilities. At Byrne & Jones, we are dedicated to helping schools, universities, and communities create exceptional outdoor recreational spaces for their athletes. By introducing Byrne & Jones as a trusted resource for running track construction and resurfacing projects, our goal is to help transform athletic facilities and foster a greater sense of pride and satisfaction among their users. If you are interested in learning more about designing, building, or maintaining a running track in your community, please reach out to us at (314) 254-9766. 

Follow us for more

Complete Guide to Polyurethane Running Track Maintenance

Complete Guide to Polyurethane Running Track Maintenance

Track Icon

The Complete Guide to Polyurethane Running Track Maintenance

So, you’ve invested in building or installing a polyurethane running track…now what?

A polyurethane running track is one of the most valuable athletic facility assets a school or university owns — and one of the most expensive to replace when neglected. With proper maintenance, a well-installed polyurethane track surface should support three to four resurfacing cycles and deliver 20 to 25 years of competition-grade performance before full reconstruction is needed. Without it, the same track can deteriorate to the point of replacement in under a decade.

Good vs Bad Track Comparison
This guide walks athletic directors, facility managers, and school board members through everything that goes into maintaining a polyurethane running track — from routine cleaning and inspection schedules through long-term lifecycle planning. The goal isn’t to turn you into a track builder. It’s to help you protect your facility investment, ask the right questions of your contractors, and recognize problems before they become emergency repairs.

If your track is showing signs of wear or you’d like an expert assessment, Byrne & Jones Sports provides free track evaluations across the Midwest — our ASBA Certified Track Builders will inspect your facility and provide a written maintenance recommendation.

In this guide

Why polyurethane track maintenance matters

Polyurethane track surfaces are engineered systems, not pavement. The 11 to 13 millimeters of polyurethane that runners actually train and compete on sits over a precisely-engineered asphalt base, drainage system, and aggregate sub-base. When the surface is well-maintained, it protects every layer beneath it. When it’s neglected, water infiltration, vegetation, and unauthorized use compromise the entire system — and base failures cost roughly five times more to repair than surface-level maintenance.

A well-maintained polyurethane track also performs better. Surface hardness, vertical deformation, and energy return all degrade with neglect, increasing athlete injury risk and slowing performance. For competition-certified facilities (IAAF, NCAA, state high school championship sites), routine maintenance is what keeps the track within governing-body tolerances year after year.

The maintenance economics are straightforward: A facility that budgets $3,000 to $8,000 per year in maintenance and inspection costs typically extends total system life from 12 years to 22+ years. Over a 20-year horizon, that’s roughly $60,000 to $160,000 in maintenance investment vs. one or two avoided full reconstructions at $400,000 to $1.2 million each.

Polyurethane running track lifecycle planning

A polyurethane track has three distinct maintenance horizons. Planning your facility budget around these intervals prevents emergency capital requests and ensures the track stays competition-ready throughout its life:

  • Annual maintenance and inspection. Routine cleaning, crack sealing, drainage clearing, surface inspection, and minor repairs. Annual cost typically runs $3,000 to $8,000 for a standard 400-meter facility.
  • Periodic respray (every 6 to 8 years). A 2-millimeter polyurethane wearing course sprayed over the existing surface restores color, traction, and surface integrity. Significantly less expensive than full resurfacing and extends overall system life.
  • Full polyurethane resurfacing (every 7 to 9 years for polyurethane systems; every 3 to 5 years for latex/acrylic systems). Removes the degraded wearing course and applies a new polyurethane surface over the existing base. Typical cost: $150,000 to $350,000 for a 400-meter facility.
  • Full system reconstruction (every 20 to 25 years). Required when the asphalt base, drainage, or sub-base have failed. A well-engineered base typically supports three to four resurfacing cycles before reconstruction is needed.

Latex/acrylic track systems require more frequent resurfacing — every 3 to 5 years — to prevent grooving in high-wear areas including starting zones, lanes 1 and 2, and field event runways. This is one of the primary reasons most school and university facilities have moved away from latex toward polyurethane systems despite the higher upfront installation cost.

8 essential tips for polyurethane track maintenance

The following maintenance practices, applied consistently, are the difference between a track that lasts 12 years and a track that lasts 25. Most are simple. None are optional.

Tip 1: Sweep and clean the track surface regularly

Loose debris — leaves, dirt, grass clippings, athletic equipment residue — gets ground into the polyurethane surface by foot traffic. Once embedded, abrasive material accelerates wear at predictable points (lanes 1 and 2, exchange zones, finish lines). A weekly sweep with a soft-bristle broom plus quarterly wash-down with low-pressure water is sufficient for most facilities. Avoid pressure washing above 1,000 PSI — high-pressure water damages polyurethane surface texture.

Tip 2: Inspect the surface for damage on a scheduled basis

Surface issues that are caught early are cheap to repair. The same issues caught late often require full resurfacing. Visual inspection should happen monthly during athletic season and at the start of each spring before competition use resumes. Document any changes in a facility log — photos with dates make the difference between catching a developing crack and missing it entirely.

Tip 3: Address cracks and surface damage immediately

Cracks expand. Water enters cracks and freezes. Freeze-thaw cycles widen cracks until they reach the asphalt base. A 2-inch surface crack caught in spring and patched costs roughly $200 to $500. The same crack ignored for two winters becomes a base failure that costs $20,000 to $50,000 to repair. Treat every visible crack as a 30-day repair window.

Tip 4: Maintain drainage and clear debris from drains

Drainage failure is the single most common cause of premature track failure. Sub-surface drains, perimeter drains, and surface drains should be visually inspected quarterly and physically cleared annually. Grass clippings, leaves, and dirt collect in drain grates and slowly clog the underlying piping. If you ever see water pooling on the track surface, contact your track contractor immediately — pooling water is a leading indicator of impending base failure.

Tip 5: Keep weeds, vegetation, and grass off the track surface

Vegetation breaking through the track surface means moisture has penetrated to the base layer and joint sealants have failed. If you see weeds growing through any part of the track, the immediate area needs surface and joint repair before the problem spreads. Pre-emptively, keep landscaping at least 36 inches back from the track perimeter and avoid sprinklers that overspray onto the surface.

Tip 6: Restrict the track to running and walking only

Polyurethane track surfaces are engineered for running and walking traffic only. Roller blades, skateboards, bicycles, motorized vehicles, strollers, and equipment carts all cause damage that the polyurethane surface isn’t designed to withstand. See the restricted activities section below for the complete list and recommended signage practice.

Tip 7: Use proper maintenance equipment

The wrong maintenance equipment causes more damage than no maintenance at all. Avoid: pressure washers above 1,000 PSI, metal-bristle brooms, gas-powered leaf blowers operated directly on the surface, sharp-edged ice removal tools, salt or de-icing chemicals (use sand or potassium-based de-icers only), and chemical herbicides not approved for polyurethane surfaces. When in doubt, contact your track contractor for approved product recommendations.

Tip 8: Schedule annual professional inspections

A facility manager doing monthly visual inspections will catch obvious issues. A certified track builder doing an annual professional inspection will catch developing issues that aren’t visible to the untrained eye — sub-base settlement, joint failure, surface hardness changes, drainage problems below grade. Most reputable contractors offer annual inspections as part of a maintenance contract; expect to budget $500 to $2,000 per year depending on facility size and inspection scope.

Need a professional track evaluation?

Byrne & Jones Sports provides free track evaluations across nine Midwest states. Our ASBA Certified Track Builders perform full visual inspection, surface hardness testing, drainage assessment, and crack mapping — with a detailed written report and maintenance plan delivered within two weeks. Request a free evaluation →

Restricted activities on a polyurethane track

One of the most common sources of polyurethane track damage is community use that the surface wasn’t designed for. The damage often isn’t reversible without resurfacing — and many facilities don’t realize what’s happening until the damage is severe.

Activities that should never be allowed on a polyurethane track surface:

  • Roller blading and roller skating
  • Skateboarding
  • Bicycle riding (including kids’ bikes and tricycles)
  • Scooters and similar wheeled toys
  • Motorized vehicles of any kind — golf carts, ATVs, maintenance vehicles, mowers
  • Strollers and wagons
  • Furniture, athletic equipment, or staging materials placed directly on the surface
  • Cleated footwear other than approved soft track spikes
  • Dogs on leashes or pets of any kind

For facilities open to community use, post visible signage at every track entrance listing what activities are restricted, what footwear is permitted, and when the track is open for team vs. community use. Even with signage, some unauthorized use will happen — but signage materially reduces the rate of incidents and gives facility managers grounds to redirect users.

Byrne & Jones Sports provides standardized track-restriction signage on every new track installation. For replacement signage on an existing facility, contact our service team.

Common sources of running track damage

Beyond unauthorized use, polyurethane tracks face predictable damage threats that proper maintenance practices can largely prevent. The most common sources of damage on school and university tracks:

  • Lawn maintenance equipment. Mowers operated too close to the track edge can throw debris onto the surface, scrape the perimeter, or tear the polyurethane with rotating blades. Weed eaters and string trimmers used along the track edge frequently cut into the surface. Establish a 36-inch no-mow zone around the track and use hand-tools or approved equipment for that perimeter.
  • Gates and access points dragging on the surface. Any gate, fence panel, or access door that drags on the polyurethane will abrade and eventually tear the surface. Check all hardware quarterly for proper clearance and adjust hinges as needed.
  • Sprinkler overspray and irrigation leaks. Sprinklers from adjacent fields that overspray onto the track repeatedly soak the surface and contribute to base degradation. Adjust sprinkler heads to direct water away from the track, and check for irrigation leaks at the start of each season.
  • Equipment storage on the surface. Hurdles, starting blocks, javelin cages, high jump pits, and pole vault pits stored on the polyurethane surface during off-season create pressure points that depress the polyurethane permanently. Use storage areas off the surface, or place protective matting under stored equipment.
  • Lawn service equipment crossing the track. When grounds crews drive lawn equipment, mowers, or maintenance vehicles across the track to reach interior fields, the resulting damage is often invisible until weeks later. Establish designated crossing zones with protective matting, or route equipment around the track entirely.
  • Snow and ice removal equipment. Plow blades, salt spreaders, and metal-edged shovels all damage polyurethane surfaces. For facilities in freeze-thaw climates, use only approved snow removal practices (rubber-edged scrapers, sand-based de-icers, no salt).

Running track inspection schedule and annual checklist

A structured inspection schedule catches developing issues before they become emergency repairs. Below is the recommended cadence for a polyurethane track facility:

Weekly inspections (10-15 minutes)

  • Visual walk-through for new debris, vegetation, or visible damage
  • Surface sweeping
  • Check that signage is in place and legible
  • Confirm gates and access points close properly without dragging

Monthly inspections (30-45 minutes)

  • Full perimeter walk noting any new cracks, surface tears, or color changes
  • Photo documentation of any new issues with date
  • Drain grate inspection — clear debris
  • Lane line and field event marking condition check
  • Fence and perimeter condition check (bulging, sagging, tears)

Quarterly inspections (1-2 hours)

  • Surface wash-down with low-pressure water
  • Detailed crack mapping (length, width, depth, location)
  • Sub-surface drain function check (run water through; confirm flow)
  • Sprinkler / irrigation overspray assessment
  • Equipment storage practices review

Annual professional inspection (4-6 hours)

  • Full schematic mapping by certified track builder
  • Surface hardness testing (Shore A durometer)
  • Surface thickness verification
  • Base condition assessment (visual + selective core sampling if indicated)
  • Drainage system camera inspection (every 5 to 7 years)
  • Written report with prioritized repair recommendations
  • Resurfacing timeline projection

Late winter through early spring is the ideal annual inspection window — the highs and lows of winter temperatures, combined with an off-season of non-use, often reveal unexpected problems that left untreated could lead to more serious damage once athletic activities resume.

How to spot surface issues before they become major repairs

The cost difference between catching a track issue early and catching it late can be 50 to 100 times the original repair cost. Train your facility staff to look for these specific warning signs:

  • Surface tears. Often caused by lawn equipment or sharp objects. Small tears can be patched if caught within weeks. Larger or aged tears require surface replacement in the affected area.
  • Color fading in isolated areas. Localized fading often indicates a chemical exposure event (spilled fuel, fertilizer, irrigation chemical) that has degraded the polyurethane. Test the area for surface integrity.
  • Color fading uniformly across the entire surface. Uniform fading throughout the track indicates UV degradation has reached the binder layer. This signals that respray or full resurfacing is approaching.
  • Cracks at the inside or outside lane edges. Edge cracking is the most common starting point for surface issues. Cracks at the inside curb or outside perimeter should be sealed within 30 days of appearing.
  • Bubbling or blistering. Raised areas in the polyurethane indicate moisture trapped below the surface. The cause is usually drainage failure or vapor pressure from the asphalt base. Requires professional assessment.
  • Soft spots or unusual surface flex. Areas where the surface feels softer underfoot than surrounding areas may indicate base settlement or delamination.
  • Water pooling after rain. Any standing water on the surface 30 minutes after rain stops indicates a drainage failure or settlement issue. This is a serious warning sign.
  • Vegetation growing through the surface. Plants of any kind breaking through the track surface mean the polyurethane has been compromised and the base is exposed to moisture. Immediate repair required.

When to resurface vs. replace your running track

One of the most consequential decisions a facility manager makes is whether to resurface an existing track or replace it entirely. The wrong call in either direction wastes capital. Use this decision framework:

Resurfacing is the right call when:

  • The asphalt base is intact (no major cracking, settlement, or delamination)
  • Drainage is functioning properly (no pooling, no waterlogging)
  • Surface wear and color fade are the primary issues
  • The track is within 15 years of the last full reconstruction
  • Previous resurfacing cycles have performed as expected

Full replacement is necessary when:

  • Cracking, bubbling, or dips have extended through the polyurethane into the asphalt base
  • Plants and weeds are growing through the track surface in multiple locations
  • Delamination — the polyurethane top layer separating from the asphalt base — is visible
  • Multiple resurfacing cycles have failed to restore expected performance
  • The track is 20+ years old and has already supported three or more resurfacing cycles
  • Drainage failures cannot be corrected without base reconstruction

If two or more of the replacement signs are present, schedule a professional evaluation immediately. Full replacement projects require 6 to 12 months of pre-construction planning, so identifying the need a full year before the construction window is critical.

Running track crack repair guide

Crack repair on a polyurethane track depends on how deep the crack extends. The earlier the crack is caught, the simpler the repair.

Cracks in the upper polyurethane layer only. Surface cracking that hasn’t penetrated to the asphalt base is repaired with crack patching: the affected area is cleaned, filled with compatible polyurethane material, and feathered into the surrounding surface. Routine maintenance procedure, low cost.

Cracks extending into the asphalt base. Deeper cracking signals a structural issue in the asphalt layer — usually base settlement, drainage failure, or freeze-thaw damage. Repair requires removing the affected surface, investigating and repairing the asphalt base, and rebuilding the surface over the corrected base. Significantly more expensive than surface patching.

Cracks indicating subbase or drainage failure. When cracks are spreading despite repairs, or when multiple cracks appear across the track simultaneously, the issue is typically in the subbase or drainage system. Full surface removal and base reconstruction may be the only long-term solution.

Cracks most commonly start on the outside or inside edges of the track and propagate inward. Inspect lane edges first — that’s where developing cracks typically appear before they spread.

When to schedule professional evaluations

The best window for a comprehensive professional track evaluation is late winter through early spring — specifically February through April for most Midwest facilities. There are three reasons for this timing:

  • Winter damage is visible. Freeze-thaw cycles, snow removal damage, and moisture infiltration reveal themselves over winter. An inspection in late winter catches all of it.
  • Repair scheduling is feasible. Most track contractors book the summer construction window 6 to 12 months in advance. A February evaluation gives you time to schedule summer repair work before the contractor’s calendar fills.
  • Budget cycles align. Most school district fiscal years run July through June. A late-winter inspection produces a recommendation that fits into the next-year budget cycle.

Additionally, schedule a focused inspection any time you observe a specific warning sign — water pooling, new cracks, bubbling, or unusual surface conditions. Don’t wait for the annual review if something visibly changes.

Cooperative purchasing for track maintenance contracts

Many school districts and universities can procure track maintenance services through cooperative purchasing agencies rather than open bid. The major agencies relevant to track maintenance projects include Sourcewell, OMNIA Partners, TIPS, and various state-level cooperatives.

The advantage of cooperative purchasing for ongoing maintenance contracts is procurement efficiency — pre-vetted contractors, established pricing, and significantly reduced administrative burden. For routine annual maintenance, inspection contracts, and crack repair work, cooperative purchasing can compress procurement timelines from months to days.

If your district uses cooperative purchasing, confirm contractor membership early. Byrne & Jones Sports participates in cooperative purchasing programs relevant to school athletic facility maintenance — see our running track services for current cooperative memberships.

Ready to set up a maintenance program?

Byrne & Jones Sports has been resurfacing and maintaining running tracks across the Midwest since 1976 — 23 ASBA awards, four certified track builders on staff, and free evaluations across Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Missouri, Ohio, Tennessee, and Wisconsin. Request a free track evaluation → or call (314) 254-9766.

Follow us for more

Byrne & Jones Sports Construction Receives 5 ASBA Awards in 2022

Byrne & Jones Sports Construction Receives 5 ASBA Awards in 2022

ASBA logo

Byrne & Jones Sports Construction Receives Five ASBA Awards in 2022

The American Sports Builders Association (ASBA), the national organization for builders and suppliers of materials for athletic facilities, has announced the winners of its annual awards. Awards are presented each year to facilities built by ASBA members, which display construction excellence.

Awards are presented in various categories: Tennis Courts, Running Tracks, Sports Fields, Pickleball Facilities and Track & Field Facilities. Within some categories, there are divisions; for example, the Sports Field category recognizes single- and multiple-field facilities.

Members of the Byrne & Jones Sports Construction team made their way out to Palm Desert, California where the winners of awards were announced at the Association’s 2022 Technical Meeting. Byrne & Jones Sports Construction was honored to receive the following awards:

Rantoul Design Build

Rantoul Family Sports Complex | Gold Medal Multi-Field Distinguished Sports Facility

Among the winners was The Rantoul Family Sports Complex, located in Rantoul, Illinois, for Best Multi- Field Facility. Byrne & Jones Construction completed the Rantoul Family Sports Complex in Spring of 2021. The outdoor Sports Tourism Complex includes 10 ball diamonds and 8 multi-use fields for contact sports. The all-synthetic turf facility recently ended their second season and has seen nearly one million visitors in 2022, hosting play for baseball, softball, soccer, lacrosse, rugby, football, ultimate frisbee, and numerous community events. Mayor Chuck Smith states, “We are thankful to the ASBA for this year’s special honor and recognition. We are proud of our leadership team and also our partnership with Byrne and Jones Sports Construction of St. Louis, Mo. If you haven’t had a chance to visit our facility, I encourage you to visit soon. I am confident that you will find a wide selection of sports options, along with a first-class sports center, located in one of the fastest growing communities in central Illinois.”

The 2023 season begins in late March with the Rantoul Township High School Baseball Invite and will extend well into November. Director of Operations Ryan Reid said, “This award is a true honor. With the leadership of Byrne & Jones, dedication from their subcontractors to see construction through during a tough 2020, and the collaboration between the different departments of the Village of Rantoul, we had the best team for this project. Special thanks to Mayor Smith, our Board of Trustees, Administrator Eisenhauer, and Recreation Director Luke Humphrey for moving this vision forward.”

Rantoul Family Sports Complex Under Construction
Rantoul Family Sports Complex Under Construction 1
Rantoul Family Sports Complex Completed

Seneca Athletic Complex | Distinguished Multi-Field Facility

Seneca School District hired Byrne & Jones through TIPS Cooperative Purchasing early in January of 2021.  The project consisted of an 8 lane running track, a new baseball stadium, and a synthetic turf baseball field.  The new athletic facilities solved many issues for the district. 

Superintendent Dr. Brandon Eggleston said the impressive features are sure to have virtually everyone in this Southwest Missouri town of about 2,500 residents swelling with pride about this project.  “The track is an eight-lane stand-alone track. The new multi-purpose facility will have locker rooms, bathrooms, a storage area and a concession stand. The track will also be open for the public to use.”  Eggleston went on saying, “Our previous baseball and softball fields were in a flood plain and flooded frequently. And with the new location, we do not have to worry about flooding.  We did not even have a track to practice on, so that is significant for our student-athletes. We now have a complex that can host any size track meet and a baseball/softball field that will be a state-of-the-art facility.  The complex will be a point of pride for our community. It is a place where our student-athletes can compete that is safe, high quality and reliable.” 

Seneca ASBA Award
Seneca Track Baseball Field

Westville High School | Distinguished Multi-Field Facility

Westville’s renovations posed a particular challenge only fit for the most experienced design-build sports contractor. They needed to entrust someone to redesign and shift the location of their existing stadium to fit a new concrete plaza and fitness building, and expanded bleachers, in the extremely limited space they had available.

Having saved capital funds for years and having one shot to get it right, Westville entrusted Byrne & Jones with this huge responsibility. Not to mention the tight schedule it needed to be built within – the project was approved in November 2020, design was completed by January 2021, construction started in February and the new stadium was ready for play by August of 2021, along with a full new turf baseball and softball field. The great success of this project was also awarded the project spotlight in TIPS Purchasing Cooperative’s quarterly newsletter.

Westville Construction 1
Westville Construction 2
Westville Construction 3

La Salle Peru High School | Distinguished Single Field Facility

One of the most historic football stadiums in Illinois, Howard Fellows Stadium was originally constructed during the Great Depression with funding from FDR’s New Deal incentives.  LaSalle-Peru (LP) High School has called this field home for over 80 years, and through thoughtful and proper upkeep and restoration projects, have been able to keep the stadium current while maintaining its historic legacy. The most recent of these upgrade projects was a severely important one – upgrading the playing surface.  Having been plagued by poor drainage and dirt runoff, the stadium field had slowly become a surface full of ruts and puddles. 

LP ran an internal analysis of their options to renovate the field, including a full strip, regrading and re-sodding of the field, and installing synthetic turf.

Ultimately, LP decided that installing synthetic turf was the proper decision due its consistency as a safe playing surface, as well as improved drainage for the site and far less maintenance expenditures.  And this wasn’t any ordinary turf field – LP opted to install a field that rivals most NFL stadiums, choosing the highly resilient IronTurf Woven product from Greenfields, resting on top of a Brock concussion safety pad.  In order to accomplish this, LP sought out the best sports construction team in the business and hired Byrne & Jones directly through a purchasing cooperative to get the job done.  Byrne & Jones successfully delivered their project on time and on-budget.

La Salle Peru Construction 2
La Salle Peru Construction 1
La Salle Peru Construction 3

Plummer Family Park | Distinguished Multi-Field Facility

Plummer Family Park opened in Edwardsville, IL, in August of 2020 and is already becoming a regional destination for tournaments and traveling athletes. The 83-acre, $12.8 million park includes four baseball/softball diamonds, six multi-purpose fields, 12 pickleball courts, concession stands, restrooms, a shared-use path, and parking for 821 vehicles, including 22 ADA-compliant spaces. Additional ball diamonds, a community park space, and additional parking are planned for a future phase.

Plummer Construction 1
Plummer Family Park Aerial Shot
Plummer Construction 3

Byrne & Jones Sports Facilty Construction

If you are interested in learning more about designing and building a world-class athletic facility you can reach out to us at  (314) 254-9766 and ask to speak with a member of our Sports Division. We have completed over 1300+ athletic facility improvement projects across the Midwest since 2010. By combining our in-house design team with certified track and field builders, we can help our clients build their dream facility. From start to finish, we will be with you every step of the way. We are now the winners of 14 ASBA awards – which you can view here.

Follow us for more